
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sjarvis.com &#187; popculture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sjarvis.com/tag/pop_culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sjarvis.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 04:21:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TV Roundup</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2006/01/08/tv-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2006/01/08/tv-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battlestar_galactica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/2006/01/08/tv-roundup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January: new shows, returning shows. Just a few highlights from recent viewing. Battlestar Galactica: Season 2.5 (or is it 3.0?) started off with a BANG Friday night! Amazing character-driven action show. With the latest episode, BSG proves that it&#8217;s still the best drama on TV today. Seriously. I&#8217;m not making it up. Even if you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January: new shows, returning shows. Just a few highlights from recent viewing.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Battlestar Galactica</strong>: Season 2.5 (or is it 3.0?) started off with a BANG Friday night! Amazing character-driven action show. With the latest episode, BSG proves that it&#8217;s still the best drama on TV today. Seriously. I&#8217;m not making it up. Even if you don&#8217;t like SciFi, you should still be watching this show. It transcends SF in the best way possible.</li>
<li><strong>The Book of Daniel</strong>: Despite the controversy of two NBC affiliates (including one in my home state, KARK in Little Rock) pulling it, it&#8217;s NOT offensive. Well, not very, anyway. The thing that most uptight &#8220;Christians&#8221; (I hate to actually call them that) objected to &#8212; Jesus being a character in the show &#8212; I found the most compelling part of the show. The rest of it is mostly just a soap opera about a priest and the people around him (mostly his family). I thought, other than being a white guy, that Jesus was portrayed remarkably positively. I think I&#8217;ll give it a few more weeks, even though it conflicts with <cite>Numb3rs</cite> (one of the best dramas on TV) and <cite>Monk</cite> (a once-terrific show that may have jumped the shark).</li>
</ol>
<p>Okay, maybe I should call this post a <em>mini</em> roundup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2006/01/08/tv-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Missed it by THAT much&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2005/09/27/missed-it-by-that-much/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2005/09/27/missed-it-by-that-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIP, Agent 86. Get Smart was always one of my favorite shows growing up. Don Adams was a comic genius. And Barbara Feldon&#8217;s Agent 99 was my second love (after &#8220;Half Pint&#8221; from Little House on the Prairie, natch). I think that show fueled my life-long love of the spy genre, though later spoofs (e.g., [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/27/arts/television/27adams.html">Agent 86.</a></p>
<p><cite>Get Smart</cite> was always one of my favorite shows growing up. Don Adams was a comic genius. And Barbara Feldon&#8217;s Agent 99 was my second love (after &#8220;Half Pint&#8221; from <cite>Little House on the Prairie</cite>, natch). I think that show fueled my life-long love of the spy genre, though later spoofs (e.g., the Austin Powers movies) left me pretty cold. RIP, Mr. Adams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2005/09/27/missed-it-by-that-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ozarks at Large podcast</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2005/07/26/ozarks-at-large-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2005/07/26/ozarks-at-large-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/2005/07/26/ozarks-at-large-podcast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our local NPR station, KUAF 91.3FM is now podcasting a great local show, Ozarks at Large. Ozarks at Large covers a wide range of interesting topics, witness the description of this week&#8217;s show: On this edition of Ozarks at Large&#8230;we spend an afternoon with the defending world champion drum and bugle corps and get the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our local NPR station, <a href="http://www.kuaf.com/">KUAF 91.3FM</a> is now <a href="http://www.kuaf.org/KUAFDownloads.html">podcasting a great local show, Ozarks at Large.</a> <cite>Ozarks at Large</cite> covers  a wide range of interesting topics, witness the description of this week&#8217;s show:</p>
<p>
<blockquote>On this edition of Ozarks at Large&#8230;we spend an afternoon with the defending world champion drum and bugle corps and get the latest on the study of the New Madrid Fault.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/kuaf/podcast/380.xml">RSS FEED</a></p>
<p><strike><strong>WARNING:</strong> I added the above link before actually downloading the podcast. It turns out that it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;podcast&#8221; after all. Rather, it&#8217;s an RSS feed of links to pages where the shows can be listened to in a streaming WMA (Windows Media Audio) format. Blech. I sent them an email pointing out that such a beast isn&#8217;t a &#8220;podcast&#8221; at all. Hopefully, they&#8217;ll rectify the situation soon.</strike></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE 2005.08.26:</strong> Looks like they finally got it up as an actual podcast. Excellent! I&#8217;m downloading a stack of episodes now. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2005/07/26/ozarks-at-large-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Emmys for Battlestar Galactica</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2005/07/14/no-emmys-for-battlestar-galactica/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2005/07/14/no-emmys-for-battlestar-galactica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the Emmy nominations are out and Battlestar Galactica got rooked. I love SciFi. But, even if you don&#8217;t, BG is an incredibly well-done series. Great characters, great character development, a very intriguingly-put-together &#8220;sci fi&#8221; universe, great acting. Great, great, great. Really. Give it a shot. Season 2 starts Friday night (7/15) on the SciFi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the <a href="http://www.emmys.org/awards/primetimeawards.php">Emmy nominations are out</a> and <a href="http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/">Battlestar Galactica</a> got rooked. I love SciFi. But, even if you don&#8217;t, BG is an incredibly well-done series. Great characters, great character development, a very intriguingly-put-together &#8220;sci fi&#8221; universe, great acting. Great, great, great. Really. Give it a shot. Season 2 starts Friday night (7/15) on the <a href="http://www.scifi.com/">SciFi Network</a>. Watch it, then watch <a href="http://www.usanetwork.com/series/monk/">Monk</a> on USA Network. Monk&#8217;s star, Tony Shaloub, DID get an Emmy nomination this year (he&#8217;s won at least once for that role), and this week&#8217;s episode marks the return of guest star <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0001806/">John Turturro</a> as Monk&#8217;s equally-oddball brother, Ambrose Monk, whose first appearance a couple of seasons ago was maybe the best single episode of the series to date. Friday on cable is the real &#8220;Must See TV.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2005/07/14/no-emmys-for-battlestar-galactica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wil got cut</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2002/08/15/wil-got-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2002/08/15/wil-got-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wil Wheaton got cut from Star Trek: Nemesis. That&#8217;s too bad. As much as Wil is sort ambivalent about his whole ST experience (and what it&#8217;s done to his career), I was looking forward to seeing Wesley Crusher ride again, if just for a bit of closure. I hope that footage (apparently, they cut 48 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wil Wheaton <a href="http://www.wilwheaton.net/mt/archives/001089.php#001089">got cut</a> from Star Trek: Nemesis. That&#8217;s too bad. As much as Wil is sort ambivalent about his whole ST experience (and what it&#8217;s done to his career), I was looking forward to seeing Wesley Crusher ride again, if just for a bit of closure.</p>
<p>I hope that footage (apparently, they cut 48 minutes) shows up on the DVD release, since that&#8217;s what DVDs are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2002/08/15/wil-got-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leo McKern RIP</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2002/07/24/leo-mckern-rip/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2002/07/24/leo-mckern-rip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leo McKern, who starred as Rumpole in the British TV series, Rumpole of the Bailey,has died. My wife and I had read all the Rumpole books before seeing the TV series, and McKern WAS Rumpole. RIP.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo McKern, who starred as Rumpole in the British TV series, Rumpole of the Bailey,<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2146615.stm">has died.</a> My wife and I had read all the Rumpole books before seeing the TV series, and McKern WAS Rumpole. RIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2002/07/24/leo-mckern-rip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kitty Maki</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2002/07/11/kitty-maki/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2002/07/11/kitty-maki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kitty maki is the shiznit! I MUST have some! Amazing handwoven functional art that achieves three things of greatness: (1) denigrates cats (I despise them), (2) glorfies sushi (I love it), and (3) gives you a place to store your TP (I find it useful).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.deviantgoods.com/products/kittymaki.html" title="view the Kitty Maki at deviantgoods.com">kitty maki</a> is the shiznit! I MUST have some! Amazing handwoven functional art that achieves three things of greatness: (1) denigrates cats (I despise them), (2) glorfies sushi (I love it), and (3) gives you a place to store your TP (I find it useful).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2002/07/11/kitty-maki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only in the South</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2002/06/14/only-in-the-south/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2002/06/14/only-in-the-south/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#8217;t make this stuff up: a strange story of a radical field buttockectomy in Alabama. It&#8217;s the heat. And the humidity. And the culture of violence that pervades America, especially the South. I&#8217;m a Southerner, so I can make these accusations. [hat tip to Scooter, who doesn't have a link to link to]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t make this stuff up: a strange <a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20020613/ap_wo_en_po/us_man_attacked_1">story of a radical field buttockectomy</a> in Alabama. It&#8217;s the heat. And the humidity. And the culture of violence that pervades America, especially the South. I&#8217;m a Southerner, so I can make these accusations. [hat tip to Scooter, who doesn't have a link to link to]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2002/06/14/only-in-the-south/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I finally saw Episode II</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2002/05/26/i-finally-saw-episode-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2002/05/26/i-finally-saw-episode-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2002 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In general, I liked it. I didn&#8217;t go in with great expectations (as with Episode I), and I waited a week or so. SPOILERS ahead&#8230; Some observations: The acting is horrible &#8212; wooden and stilted. The best acting in the whole movie is from Yoda, who is entirely computer-generated (and much better done than the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, I liked it. I didn&#8217;t go in with great expectations (as with Episode I), and I waited a week or so.  SPOILERS ahead&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-177"></span><br />
Some observations:</p>
<p>The acting is horrible &#8212; wooden and stilted. The best acting in the whole movie is from Yoda, who is entirely computer-generated (and much better done than the frog king guy from Episode I). I thought Yoda was really well done here. I loved watching him bust Dooku&#8217;s ass (for a little while, anyway), especially the Force quick-draw of the lightsaber and the acrobatics.</p>
<p>I like that they took every opportunity to show off Natalie Portman&#8217;s skin. I especially liked the way the tiger-thingy ripped her clothes into a Britney Spears-like costume for the climactic battle scene. </p>
<p>Having the guy who played Owen Lars in Episode IV play Owen&#8217;s father in this one was nice.</p>
<p>Why is R2-D2 flying? Why is C-3PO in it at all, and why does he have such crappy and annoying one-liner-type lines?</p>
<p>Playing the Darth Vader theme when whiny puss-boy Anakin goes on a tirade was a nice touch. Giving him the most famous Han Solo line was a stupid touch. It would have been better from Obi-Wan, who gets off some nice (well, nice for a Star Wars flick) one liners.</p>
<p>Why is Mace Windu the only one with a purple lightsaber? Is there any special significance to the color of one&#8217;s lightsaber other than the obvious one that the bad guys have red ones? Yoda&#8217;s is green, btw.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t like seeing Jango Fett&#8217;s face. I think they took away most (if not all) of Boba Fett&#8217;s mystique by doing this. He still has the coolest ship, though.</p>
<p>The Corinains (or however you say their collective name) were well-done.</p>
<p>If you see it, see it in a digital theater. The visual effects are fucking amazing in digital. I&#8217;d almost be willing to see it again just to see all that groovy effects work again on the big screen.</p>
<p>Lucas recycles too much from earlier movies. To wit: the execution scene at the end is much like Luke&#8217;s battle with the Rancor in Jabba&#8217;s palace, Anakin loses his arm by having it chopped off by the bad guy who&#8217;s trying to recruit him (and gets it replaced with a creepy chrome skeleton thing), the &#8220;disappearing bridge&#8221; thing (though it was handled differently), the space chase/battle through the asteroid field, etc. In each case (pretty much), Lucas got to remake a scene with immensely better efx is all.</p>
<p>IN SUM: It&#8217;s an EFX extravaganza with a little plot and some bad acting wrapped around it so they could actually call it a movie. Better than Episode I and maybe better than <em>Return of the Jedi</em> in some respects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2002/05/26/i-finally-saw-episode-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jumping the Shark</title>
		<link>http://sjarvis.com/2002/01/25/jumping-the-shark/</link>
		<comments>http://sjarvis.com/2002/01/25/jumping-the-shark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shortpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjarvis.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day, I was watching Happy Days on cable. It was the episode from late in the show&#8217;s run where the Fonz is water skiing while wearing his leather jacket. While skiing, a shark appears, and Fonzie has to use a ramp to jump over the shark and escape. I realized that the episode [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day, I was watching <em>Happy Days</em> on cable. It was the episode from late in the show&#8217;s run where the Fonz is water skiing while wearing his leather jacket. While skiing, a shark appears, and Fonzie has to use a ramp to jump over the shark and escape. I realized that the episode must be the source for the phrase &#8220;jump the shark&#8221; (which, in TV talk, represents the point at which a TV has outlived its usefulness). According to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/2001-08-09-net-interest.htm">this story</a>, I&#8217;m right. I love it when that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sjarvis.com/2002/01/25/jumping-the-shark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

